REVEALED: 7 Members Of The Italian Government Living A Lavish Lifestyle While The Country Copes With Austerity



Mario Monti Italy

In keeping with his attempts to ensure transparency, austerity, and better fiscal practices, Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti has asked that his government makes ministers’ previous tax records available on the government website in a move dubbed ‘Operation Transparency’. 

And it seems like not everyone has been affected by the long-running fiscal crisis and austerity measures in Europe, especially in Italy.

Italians were shocked to learn how many of their ministers owned villas, town houses, and expensive cars and yachts, to say nothing of the amount of money they used to make before being sworn into the cabinet (all ministers now get 200,000 euros, or $265,000 on an average every year). So much so, that the site temporarily crashed because of increased traffic, The Telegraph reports.

However, the ministers themselves were unfazed by the attention. ”The most important thing is explaining that those who earn and pay their taxes must be judged positively, while those who generate off-the-books income must be judged negatively,” Justice Minister Severino told reporters, according to Italymag.

Paola Severino di Benedetto

Position: Justice Minister

Former profession: Lawyer and professor

Income in 2010: 7 million euros ($9.3 million)

Other assets: Properties in Rome and Cortina d’Ampezzo, and a leased 55 feet-long ‘Acqua 54′ yacht

(Source)




Corrado Passera

Position: Minister for Economic Development, Infrastructure, and Transportation

Former profession: Head of Italian bank Intesa San Paolo

Income in 2010: 3.5 million euros ($4.6 million)

Other assets: Properties in Casale Marittimo and Parigi

(Source)




Mario Monti

Position: Prime Minister, Minister for Economy and Finance

Former profession: President of Bocconi University

Income in 2010: 1 million euros ($1.3 million)

Other assets: Sixteen properties, including apartments in Milan and Varese, and a 50 percent share in a flat in Brussels

(Source)



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Europe on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:





Presented By:
 

Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

REVEALED: 7 Members Of The Italian Government Living A Lavish Lifestyle While The Country Copes With Austerity



Mario Monti Italy

In keeping with his attempts to ensure transparency, austerity, and better fiscal practices, Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti has asked that his government makes ministers’ previous tax records available on the government website in a move dubbed ‘Operation Transparency’. 

And it seems like not everyone has been affected by the long-running fiscal crisis and austerity measures in Europe, especially in Italy.

Italians were shocked to learn how many of their ministers owned villas, town houses, and expensive cars and yachts, to say nothing of the amount of money they used to make before being sworn into the cabinet (all ministers now get 200,000 euros, or $265,000 on an average every year). So much so, that the site temporarily crashed because of increased traffic, The Telegraph reports.

However, the ministers themselves were unfazed by the attention. ”The most important thing is explaining that those who earn and pay their taxes must be judged positively, while those who generate off-the-books income must be judged negatively,” Justice Minister Severino told reporters, according to Italymag.

Paola Severino di Benedetto

Position: Justice Minister

Former profession: Lawyer and professor

Income in 2010: 7 million euros ($9.3 million)

Other assets: Properties in Rome and Cortina d’Ampezzo, and a leased 55 feet-long ‘Acqua 54′ yacht

(Source)




Corrado Passera

Position: Minister for Economic Development, Infrastructure, and Transportation

Former profession: Head of Italian bank Intesa San Paolo

Income in 2010: 3.5 million euros ($4.6 million)

Other assets: Properties in Casale Marittimo and Parigi

(Source)




Mario Monti

Position: Prime Minister, Minister for Economy and Finance

Former profession: President of Bocconi University

Income in 2010: 1 million euros ($1.3 million)

Other assets: Sixteen properties, including apartments in Milan and Varese, and a 50 percent share in a flat in Brussels

(Source)



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Europe on Twitter and Facebook.

See Also:





Presented By:
 

Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

STOCKS SLIP ON GLOBAL GROWTH CONCERNS: Here’s What You Need To Know (DIA, SPY, QQQ, TOL, KBH, DELL)



bored traders

It’s too early to be freaking out.  But some PMI data could’ve been better.

First, the scoreboard:

Dow: 12,938.6, -27.0, -0.2%
S&P 500: 1,357.6, -4.5, -0.3%
NASDAQ: 2,933.1, -15.4, -0.5%

And now, the top stories:

  • For once, we’re not talking about Greece.  But some new global economic data appears to have the markets rattled.  During the Asian trading session, we learned that China’s HSBC Flash manufacturing PMI number climbed to 49.7, up from 48.8 in January.  However, this was also the fourth straight reading below 50, and a reading below 50 signals contraction.
  • The eurozone manufacturing PMI number inched up to just 49.5 from 48.8 a month ago.  This fell short of economists’ expectation for 49.5.  Particularly worrisome was Germany, the largest and arguably most financially stable country in the eurozone, which reported a PMI reading of 50.1 versus expectations of 51.5.
  • Actually, there was some news related to Greece.  Fitch lowered Greece’s credit rating to C from CCC, putting it deeper into junk territory.  “[D]efault is highly likely in the near term,” wrote the credit ratings agency.  However, this surprised no one and seemed to be brushed off as a non-event.
  • Existing home sales jumped 4.3 percent to 4.57 million in January.  The increase outpaced economists’ expectations for 1.1 percent growth.  However, due to sharp downward revisions to the December data, the annualized pace of home sales fell short of the expectation for 4.66 million.  Here Are The Best And Worst Economists Of 2011 >
  • In other housing news, luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers unexpectedly reported a net loss of 2 cents per share.  Competitor KB Home also fell.
  • Today’s modest sell-off also benefited Treasuries and the dollar.  The 10-year yield declined to 2.01 percent.  The ascent of the dollar was mirrored by the descent of the euro
  • Last night, Dell disappointed its shareholders when it announced its Q4 financial results.  Non-GAAP EPS came in at $0.51, missing analysts’ estimates by a penny.  Management blamed supply disruptions tied to the tragic floods in Thailand. They also expect Q1 revenue to fall 7 percent.
  • Hewlett-Packard announces quarterly earnings after the closing bell today.  Follow the release live on Business Insider.
  • Don’t Miss: Citi Presents 20 Great Stocks That The Rest Of Wall Street Hates >

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

Cutting Corporate Taxes Is A Good Idea, But It Won’t Stimulate The Economy



Obama CBS NewsThis post originally appeared at CBS Moneywatch

The White House is proposing to cut corporate income taxes from 35 percent to 28 percent. President Obama also recommends that manufacturers get a further cut, to 25 percent, and he wants to impose a minimum rate on foreign earnings to discourage the use of tax shelters. There would be other less substantive changes as well under his plan. 

The cut in the statutory tax rate, however, may not have as large an effect on the corporate sector as many anticipate. The reason is that this is intended as a revenue neutral change in taxes. To accomplish revenue neutrality, the cut in the tax rate will be accompanied by closing loopholes, i.e. a broadening of the base. Thus, every company receiving a tax break will be matched somewhere else by companies experiencing a tax increase. Thus, while some firms will benefit, others will get hit harder by these taxes and the net effect overall should be roughly a wash.

Another way you think about this, as noted by Jared Bernstein, is to consider the difference between the statutory tax rate — the rate on the books — and the effective tax rate, the rate after all deductions, loopholes, etc. have been exploited.

Read the rest of the story at CBS Moneywatch >

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

Cutting Corporate Taxes Is A Good Idea, But It Won’t Stimulate The Economy



Obama CBS NewsThis post originally appeared at CBS Moneywatch

The White House is proposing to cut corporate income taxes from 35 percent to 28 percent. President Obama also recommends that manufacturers get a further cut, to 25 percent, and he wants to impose a minimum rate on foreign earnings to discourage the use of tax shelters. There would be other less substantive changes as well under his plan. 

The cut in the statutory tax rate, however, may not have as large an effect on the corporate sector as many anticipate. The reason is that this is intended as a revenue neutral change in taxes. To accomplish revenue neutrality, the cut in the tax rate will be accompanied by closing loopholes, i.e. a broadening of the base. Thus, every company receiving a tax break will be matched somewhere else by companies experiencing a tax increase. Thus, while some firms will benefit, others will get hit harder by these taxes and the net effect overall should be roughly a wash.

Another way you think about this, as noted by Jared Bernstein, is to consider the difference between the statutory tax rate — the rate on the books — and the effective tax rate, the rate after all deductions, loopholes, etc. have been exploited.

Read the rest of the story at CBS Moneywatch >

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

The Yen Falls To A 7-Month Low



Chart

The Japanese yen continued its recent tumble today, as the dollar edged to a seven-month high of ¥80.3175 this afternoon.

The currency had not crossed above the ¥80 mark against the dollar since July 11, data provided by Bloomberg shows.

Traders may be tying the depreciation to concerns that the Japanese government could lose its ability to fund debt locally, causing a surge in yields, and the recently reported trade deficit in the nation.

“So far, Japan has funded 95% of its public sector debt issuance domestically, which has allowed JGB yields to stay low,” Morgan Stanley’s Hans Redeker and Ronald Leven wrote in a report this week. “Japan’s financial sector has used 24% of its balance sheet on government bonds, and should bond yields rise without a simultaneous economic rebound, the banking sector could face its ‘Italian moment’.”

Japan’s trade deficit has also emerged as a key fear.

There is a widespread perception that this external deficit is another way in which Japan is becoming dependent on foreign investors to provide savings,” the two say. “But, as with the internal funding situation, we think the situation is less serious than generally perceived.”

Other currencies also traded lower against the dollar today, with Great Britain’s pound and Canada’s dollar falling to $1.5679 and $1.0006, respectively.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

The Yen Falls To A 7-Month Low



Chart

The Japanese yen continued its recent tumble today, as the dollar edged to a seven-month high of ¥80.3175 this afternoon.

The currency had not crossed above the ¥80 mark against the dollar since July 11, data provided by Bloomberg shows.

Traders may be tying the depreciation to concerns that the Japanese government could lose its ability to fund debt locally, causing a surge in yields, and the recently reported trade deficit in the nation.

“So far, Japan has funded 95% of its public sector debt issuance domestically, which has allowed JGB yields to stay low,” Morgan Stanley’s Hans Redeker and Ronald Leven wrote in a report this week. “Japan’s financial sector has used 24% of its balance sheet on government bonds, and should bond yields rise without a simultaneous economic rebound, the banking sector could face its ‘Italian moment’.”

Japan’s trade deficit has also emerged as a key fear.

There is a widespread perception that this external deficit is another way in which Japan is becoming dependent on foreign investors to provide savings,” the two say. “But, as with the internal funding situation, we think the situation is less serious than generally perceived.”

Other currencies also traded lower against the dollar today, with Great Britain’s pound and Canada’s dollar falling to $1.5679 and $1.0006, respectively.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

ROBERT SHILLER: Let’s Offer Shares Of America



robert-shiller-fox

Robert Shiller has a novel idea for America.

He writes in the Harvard Business Review:

Here’s an audacious alternative: Countries should replace much of their existing national debt with shares of the “earnings” of their economies. This would allow them to better manage their financial obligations and could help prevent future financial crises. It might even lower countries’ borrowing costs in the long run.

Basically, Shiller thinks that America could be better managed if it were run more like a public corporation.

These shares could trade on stock exchanges and they would pay quarterly dividends of one-trillionth of the country’s quarterly GDP.  According to a model developed by Shiller and Mark Kamstra of York University, these shares would’ve paid $13.22 in 2010.

Shiller’s plan is rather elaborate.

But the motivation behind all of this is largely driven by one concept Shiller has always believed in: markets.  Shiller has believes that well-functioning markets can tell a lot about an asset’s perceived value.

Markets for national shares would fundamentally change the economic atmosphere. An immediate market response would accompany every new government plan affecting the future of the economy, generating a discussion of each country’s development plan, as well as a flow of international resources toward governments with plans that passed the market test.

Sure, this model might seem like a “dangerous extension of financial capitalism,” notes Shiller.  But it would ultimately be the best way to determine a country’s real worth.

But in fact the enthusiastic implementation of financial capitalism has been the story of every successful nation on the planet. We should not shrink from having real markets for countries, which would track countries’ successes much more accurately than stock markets do. Stock markets represent only claims on corporate earnings after corporate taxes—an unreliable measure of a country’s success. We can do better.

Read more about Shiller’s extremely unconventional proposal at HBR.org >

(via The Reformed Broker)

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

ROBERT SHILLER: Let’s Offer Shares Of America



robert-shiller-fox

Robert Shiller has a novel idea for America.

He writes in the Harvard Business Review:

Here’s an audacious alternative: Countries should replace much of their existing national debt with shares of the “earnings” of their economies. This would allow them to better manage their financial obligations and could help prevent future financial crises. It might even lower countries’ borrowing costs in the long run.

Basically, Shiller thinks that America could be better managed if it were run more like a public corporation.

These shares could trade on stock exchanges and they would pay quarterly dividends of one-trillionth of the country’s quarterly GDP.  According to a model developed by Shiller and Mark Kamstra of York University, these shares would’ve paid $13.22 in 2010.

Shiller’s plan is rather elaborate.

But the motivation behind all of this is largely driven by one concept Shiller has always believed in: markets.  Shiller has believes that well-functioning markets can tell a lot about an asset’s perceived value.

Markets for national shares would fundamentally change the economic atmosphere. An immediate market response would accompany every new government plan affecting the future of the economy, generating a discussion of each country’s development plan, as well as a flow of international resources toward governments with plans that passed the market test.

Sure, this model might seem like a “dangerous extension of financial capitalism,” notes Shiller.  But it would ultimately be the best way to determine a country’s real worth.

But in fact the enthusiastic implementation of financial capitalism has been the story of every successful nation on the planet. We should not shrink from having real markets for countries, which would track countries’ successes much more accurately than stock markets do. Stock markets represent only claims on corporate earnings after corporate taxes—an unreliable measure of a country’s success. We can do better.

Read more about Shiller’s extremely unconventional proposal at HBR.org >

(via The Reformed Broker)

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off

Merkel Is Leading Germany Into The Austerity Abyss



abyss

Despite weakening economic growth and industrial production in recent months, Germany continues to look much better than the rest of Europe on the surface.

It boasts a very low unemployment rate (although über-low-wage work has grown tremendously) and relatively small public deficits.

However, none of that is stopping Merkel and her administration from betting their re-election on the fact that they can implement significant austerity in the next 2 years, while also containing the Euro crisis, and “lead by example”.

Sven Böll, Peter Müller and Christian Reiermann report for Der Spiegel:

Just how healthy German finances are was revealed at the beginning of last week, in the form of an early-warning report by the European Commission. Germany was the only large country to be given an almost perfect grade.

And yet, if Merkel and Schäuble have their way, the country many in Europe already see as a model of sound budget management will become even more exemplary. “We cannot expect Greece and the other crisis-stricken countries to accept more and more austerity measures, while nothing changes in Germany,” says a close associate of the chancellor.

As such, Merkel and Schäuble want to significantly ratchet up consolidation efforts. The 2013 budget, currently being prepared at the Finance Ministry, will include many billions in savings. In addition, the last stage of the so-called debt brake — Germany’s constitutionally anchored law regulating state borrowing — will be brought forward by two years instead of going into effect as planned in 2016. Measures under discussion include cuts in social benefits and a reduction in government services. Merkel and Schäuble believe that Germany can only remain credible in the euro crisis by demonstrating that it is not simply reaping the benefits of past efforts. Germany wants to lead by example.

In other words, the German populace is about to find out just how destructive austerity can be to an economy when the world is in the midst of an ongoing Depression, in a system that values credit creation above all else. Of course, the most immediate threat to the Germany economy is financial contagion when (again, not if) Greece exits the Eurozone, which will certainly be within 0-2 years. Merkel is also betting that this will now be contained, primarily due to the ECB’s LTRO programs (the second one to occur in a week). If you ask me, that’s a lot of losing bets she’s placing on the table. Back to the austerity:

It’s an ambitious goal. To achieve it, the coalition will have to adhere to strict austerity rules in the current year’s budget, but especially when assembling the budget for 2013. According to CDU deputy floor leader Michael Meister, new borrowing will remain at €26.1 billion this year, even though the first installments of at least €8.6 billion for the new euro bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), will come due in the summer. Meister intends to achieve this goal primarily through “smart budget management.” In other words, each of the 5,500 items in the budget will be closely examined and will be granted only as much as absolutely necessary.

In addition, tax revenues last autumn were significantly higher than forecast. And Germany has also saved billions on sovereign bond interest rates, with returns at record lows due to the ongoing euro crisis.

The challenges will be greater next year. In 2013, the finance minister hopes to reduce new borrowing to €15 billion. But because the planned financial transaction tax cannot be implemented throughout Europe, and a number of additional expenses will be incurred, Schäuble will have to find some €10 billion in order to hit his target.

That is the primary motivation for assembling a new austerity package. Finance Ministry officials already have a clear idea of what it should look like. In particular, they have set their sights on the social benefits coffers, which, thanks to a strong economy, are currently well funded. Federal healthcare subsidies are to be reduced by up to €2 billion and the government’s contribution to the pension insurance system is to be trimmed by a similar amount. Both cuts are to be lasting.

Schäuble also intends to cut the budget of the Federal Employment Agency by several hundred million euros and to cap outlays for the parental leave allowance program, expenditures for which have risen substantially in recent years.

As explained in Employment = Poverty and Inequality, the German populace is not in a great position to absorb these cuts to social spending that amount to almost a 40% reduction in new borrowing by next year, and 100% in the next two. Many of them are performing part-time, low-wage work that has greatly exacerbated wealth inequality within the population. As the German export industry is squeezed from the revenue side of the equation due to extremely low demand in Europe and the world, it will be forced to lay off workers and cut wages further, placing even more people into relative poverty.

POPULATION BELOW POVERTY LINE (%)

Population Below Poverty Line

 

Assuming that everything is contained within the Euro crisis, and Greece either stays in without further German money or exits peacefully (fat chance!), these “exemplary” and ambitious austerity plans will simply place more downward pressure on German aggregate domestic demand, economic growth and tax revenues, making its deficit situation worse over time. That is especially true if Merkel sticks with the Euro experiment and is forced to pony up ever-growing sums of bailout money and Germany’s sovereign borrowing costs correspondingly rise. So Merkel may be leading Germany and Europe by example, but she’s leading them straight into the depths of economic depression and sociopolitical chaos.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Posted in Money, News, Opinion, What's Terry Reading | Comments Off